MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143302726 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2008.4547353

A High-Resolution Hybrid Digital Wattmeter for Measurements at High Voltage

2008· article· en· W2143302726 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparatorElectrical engineeringVoltageHigh voltageVoltage dividerCurrent transformerTransformerMetering modeOptical fiberElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A development of a high-voltage high-resolution digital sampling wattmeter system for on-site/in-situ calibrations of metering systems for high-voltage power/energy measurements is described in the paper. The current input uses an optically isolated hybrid two-stage current transformer with electronic circuitry that performs A/D conversion. Data is transmitted to a ground station through a fiber optic link. Another laser-driven fiber optic link transmits power to the electronic circuitry of the remote module at high voltage. The voltage input uses a current- comparator-based high voltage divider to provide low voltage replica that is converted into a digital form by A/D conversion. The uncertainty of the power measurement (2sigma) is estimated to be less than 200 muW/VA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it