Different Replication Profiles in Specific-Pathogen-Free Chickens of Two H7 Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses Isolated from Wild Birds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During an active wild bird survey conducted in Belgium from 2007 to 2011, two low pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) H7 viruses were isolated from wild birds: an H7N1 virus from a common shelduck (Tadorna tadorna) and an H7N7 virus from a Canada goose (Branta canadensis). The H7 sequence analyses and intravenous pathogenicity indices indicated that they were both low pathogenic isolates and genetically related to other recent European H7 LPAIs isolated from wild birds. Interestingly, the two isolates showed different replication profiles in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens, but poultry can be at risk from both. Indeed, the H7N1 isolated from the common shelduck had the ability to infect and to replicate efficiently in SPF chickens as indicated by high oropharyngeal and cloacal excretions compatible with efficient transmission as well as strong immune responses. On the other hand, the H7N7 isolated from the Canada goose presented a lower replication profile because the inoculated chickens excreted less virus, mostly via the oropharyngeal route, and only three chickens seroconverted. None of the chickens showed clinical signs during the entire infection. Our study using an SPF chicken model underlines that the mechanisms of adaptation of LPAIs in poultry remain unpredictable and are still poorly understood but it represents a powerful tool to gain a better evaluation of the risks of LPAI circulation in poultry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".