MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143312540 · doi:10.1121/1.4783139

Singing sands, musical grains, and booming sand dunes.

2008· article· en· W2143312540 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Patitsas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluidizationGeologyFront (military)Boundary layerShear (geology)Rigidity (electromagnetism)Materials scienceVibrationShear modulusShear stressGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialMechanicsAcousticsFluidized bedPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The origin of the seismic and acoustic emissions from a bed of singing sands or musical grains, impacted by a pestle, is sought in a boundary layer, several millimeters thick, at the leading front end of the pestle. It is assumed that such a layer is the result of the fluidization of the grain asperities due to the high stress level at the pestle front end. Such a fluidization results in a very low modulus of rigidity and in a shear phase velocity about 1 m/s in the boundary layer. The frequencies of the shear modes of vibration, in such a layer, are compared with those determined experimentally. The frequencies depend weakly on the geometry of the leading pestle front. The same concept of the boundary layer can account for the emissions from plates of sand sliding on a dune surface and from grains shaken in a glass jar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAeolian processes and effectsFrench-language works237,207