MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143330274 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.118

Secure and Scalable Video Streaming over IEEE 802.11e Based Home Networks

2007· article· en· W2143330274 on OpenAlexafffund
Azfar Moid, Abraham O. Fapojuwo, Robert J. Davies

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityComputer networkQuality of serviceEncryptionScalable Video CodingWireless networkVideo qualityVideo streamingWirelessMultimediaTelecommunicationsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a wireless video streaming system that securely and efficiently streams video to the heterogeneous clients within the home network, over time-varying communication links. We study the problem of secure and efficient video streaming over an IEEE 802.11e based wireless network and also address the issues concerning digital rights management (DRM). The importance of fine granularity scalability -moving picture experts group -4 (FGS-MPEG-4), a form of scalable video format, is discussed and its characteristics are exploited for efficient and secure video streaming. We have evaluated our proposed technique via NS2 based simulations and found that keeping the base layer encrypted and giving it a higher priority do not only fulfill the requirements of the DRM, but also help improve the overall quality of service (QoS). These findings are significant because they give the content providers a high level of security and also enhance the viewing experience of the mobile users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207