MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143350406 · doi:10.7202/012064ar

Sur la notion de « terme »

2006· article· fr· W2143350406 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie-Claude L’Homme

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article fait une synthèse de différents points de vue sur la notion de « terme » afin de répondre aux questions spécifiques qui se posent lors de l’élaboration d’un dictionnaire spécialisé. Notre étude des propositions faites dans des modèles théoriques de la terminologie et du traitement des termes dans les dictionnaires spécialisés existants révèle que les approches sont variées, souvent incompatibles et, qu’en définitive, certaines questions soulevées par la construction d’un dictionnaire restent sans réponse. Nous proposons donc une définition du terme en adéquation avec l’objectif applicatif annoncé et nous nous penchons sur ses conséquences méthodologiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.033
Scholarly communication0.0110.021
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteursSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207