MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143370493 · doi:10.1109/icsens.2008.4716694

Linear arrays of microbolometers for space applications

2008· article· en· W2143370493 on OpenAlexaff
Linh Ngo Phong, Timothy D. Pope

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'OptiqueCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCMOSDetectorOptoelectronicsIntegrated circuitElectrical engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Space-grade linear arrays of microbolometers are a new class of sensors intended for pushbroom scanned remote sensing and atmospheric sounding with limited power and mass budgets. Such applications call for: (i) microbolometers with increased speed and detectivity; (ii) radiation hard CMOS circuits allowing for simultaneous data readout from all microbolometers; and (iii) robust radiometric packages. A series of single stage and double stage microbolometers with thermal conductances from 30 to 250 nW/K have been investigated. The time constants measured on single stage and double stage devices were in good agreement with the conductances, showing values as small as 6 ms. Low frequency detectivities were found to be in the range from 108to 109cm.Hz1/2/W. Arrays of 512x3 microbolometers were monolithically built on CMOS circuits laid out such that all pixels can be read in parallel with their own signal chain. When integrated into a custom designed radiometric package, these arrays exhibit NETD values better than 80 mK to a 300 K scene using F/0.87 optics in the 8–12 um band and 50 ms integration time. The preliminary environmental tests performed on arrays integrated into a custom designed radiometric package indicated that they would meet the requirements for space operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207