MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143406174 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.054023

Measurement of inclusive<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>production in the charged-current interactions of neutrinos in a 1.3-GeV wide band beam

2011· article· en· W2143406174 on OpenAlexafffund
C. Mariani, A. Tornero-López, J. L. Alcaraz, S. Andringa, S. Aoki, Yuya Aoyama, J. Argyriades, K. Asakura, R. Ashie, F. Berghaus, H. Berns, H. Bhang, A. Blondel, S. Borghi, J. Bouchez, J. Burguet–Castell, D. Casper, J. Catala, C. Cavata, A. Cervera, S. M. Chen, K. O. Cho, J. H. Choi, U. Dore, M. Fechner, E. Fernández, Y. Fujii, Y. Fukuda, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, R. Gran, T. Hara, M. Hasegawa, T. Hasegawa, Y. Hayato, R. L. Helmer, K. Hiraide, J. Hosaka, A. K. Ichikawa, M. Iinuma, Akihiro Ikeda, Toru Ishida, K. Ishihara, T. Ishii, M. Ishitsuka, Y. Itow, T. Iwashita, H. I. Jang, E. J. Jeon, In Seok Jeong, K. K. Joo, G. Jover-Mañas, C. K. Jung, T. Kajita, J. Kameda, K. Kaneyuki, I. Kato, E. Kearns, C. O. Kim, M. Khabibullin, A. Khotjantsev, D. Kiełczewska, J. Y. Kim, S. B. Kim, P. Kitching, Kazuyoshi Kobayashi, T. Kobayashi, A. Konaka, Y. Koshio, W. Kropp, Y. Kudenko, Y. Kuno, Yoshinori Kurimoto, T. Kutter, J. G. Learned, S. Likhoded, I. T. Lim, P. Loverre, L. Ludovici, H. Maesaka, J. Mallet, S. Matsuno, V. Matveev, K. Mahn, C. McGrew, S. Mikheyev, A. Minamino, S. Mine, O. Mineev, C. Mitsuda, M. Miura, Y. Moriguchi, S. Moriyama, T. Nakadaira, M. Nakahata, K. Nakamura, I. Nakano, T. Nakaya, S. Nakayama, T. Namba, R. Nambu, S. Nawang, K. Nishikawa, Koh‐hei Nitta, F. Nova, P. Novella, Y. Obayashi, Atsushi Okada, K. Okumura, S. M. Oser, Y. Oyama, M. Y. Pac, F. Pierre, A. Rodriguez, C. Saji, M. Sakuda, F. Sánchez, K. Scholberg, R. Schroeter, M. Sekiguchi, M. Shiozawa, Kiyoshi Shiraishi, G. Sitjes, M. Smy, H. Sobel, M. Sorel, J. L. Stone, L. Sulak, Y. Suzuki, M. Tada, Tohru Takahashi, Y. Takenaga, Y. Takeuchi, K. Taki, Y. Takubo, N. Tamura, M. Tanaka, R. Terri, S. T’Jampens, Y. Totsuka, M. R. Vagins, C. W. Walter, W. Wang, R. J. Wilkes, L. Whitehead, S. Yamada, Y. Yamada, S. Yamamoto, C. Yanagisawa, N. Yershov, H. Yokoyama, M. Yokoyama, J. Yoo, M. Yoshida, J. Zalipska

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareGeneralitat ValencianaKorea Science and Engineering FoundationStrongU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoEnergy (signal processing)Production (economics)Particle physicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report on the measurement of the rate of inclusive ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ production induced by charged-current neutrino interactions in a ${\mathrm{C}}_{8}{\mathrm{H}}_{8}$ target at a mean energy of 1.3 GeV in the K2K near detector. Out of a sample of 11 606 charged-current neutrino interactions, we select 479 ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ events with two reconstructed photons. We find that the cross section for the inclusive ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}$ production relative to the charged-current quasielastic cross section is $\frac{{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{CC}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{0}}}{{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{\mathrm{CCQE}}}=0.426\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.032\text{ }(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.035\text{ }(\mathrm{syst})$. The energy-dependent cross section ratio is also measured. The results are consistent with previous experiments for exclusive channels on different targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207