MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143434775 · doi:10.1109/tcad.2005.852034

Simultaneous adaptive wire adjustment and local topology modification for tuning a bounded-skew clock tree

2005· article· en· W2143434775 on OpenAlex
H. Saaied, D. Al-Khalili, A.J. Al-Khalili, M. Nekili

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooRoyal Military College of CanadaConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkewTopology (electrical circuits)EmbeddingAlgorithmComputer scienceMerge (version control)Clock skewMathematicsParallel computingClock signalCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for incremental algorithms to implement engineering changes (ECs) in clock trees (CTs) is critical in the system-on-a-chip (SoC) design cycle. An algorithm, called adaptive wire adjustment (AWA), is proposed to minimize the clock skew iteratively to any given bound. In order to speed up AWA's convergence, a local topology-modification (LTM) technique is incorporated into AWA. Moreover, LTM incorporation into AWA results in total wire-length reduction as well. Also, the incorporation of the LTM technique into the deferred-merge embedding (DME) algorithm and Greedy-DME (GDME) helps reduce the total wire length by around 7.8% and 9.8%, respectively. Additionally, applying LTM to GDME reduces wire elongations and the standard deviation of the path lengths (SDPL) between clock pins by 96.4% and 51.5%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it