MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143456873 · doi:10.1177/0731684404041715

Predicting Elastic Constants of 2D-Braided Fiber Rigid and Elastomeric–Polymeric Matrix Composites

2004· article· en· W2143456873 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBraidMaterials scienceComposite materialKevlarComposite numberElastomerEpoxyTorsion (gastropod)Elastic modulusShear modulus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a previous work, an analytical model based on Classical Laminate Plate Theory (CLPT) was developed to predict the braid elastic constants (Ex, Ey, Gxy and xy) of closed-mesh 2Dbraided fiber composite. In this work, the sensitivity of the braid elastic constants to composite constituent elastic constants was evaluated. The torsion of thin-walled tubes was used to experimentally obtain the braid shear modulus. The results predicted by the model are in good agreement with other models and with experimental results for Ex and Gxy of Kevlar 49 fiber-braided tubes with both rigid epoxy and elastomeric polyurethane resin matrices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it