MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143471995 · doi:10.7202/018406ar

Gérald Leblanc, écrivain du village planétaire

2008· article· fr· W2143471995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Cultural and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte propose une lecture de l’oeuvre poétique de Gérald Leblanc à la lumière du concept de village planétaire forgé par Marshall MacLuhan. En observant le mouvement de dérive qui conduit le poète de la ville imaginée jusqu’au village globalisé, via ses déambulations dans les rues de Moncton et ses méditations dans les espaces du quotidien, l’auteur en arrive au constat que la polyphonie des poèmes de Leblanc est liée avant tout à la situation du poète dans l’espace communicationnel nord-américain. Moncton cesse ainsi de s’offrir comme un pur espace urbain pour devenir une réalité concrète, un chapelet de lieux et de visages familiers. Véritable réceptacle des pratiques issues de la contre-culture, l’oeuvre de Leblanc s’avère symptomatique de la condition postmoderne, qui a modifié sensiblement les paramètres régissant la position de l’écrivain dans le champ culturel. Dans cette perspective, il est possible de relire cette oeuvre comme étant l’expression de la mise en place d’une gigantesque machine cybernétique, carburant à la musique, à la voix et aux images visuelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it