Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte propose une lecture de l’oeuvre poétique de Gérald Leblanc à la lumière du concept de village planétaire forgé par Marshall MacLuhan. En observant le mouvement de dérive qui conduit le poète de la ville imaginée jusqu’au village globalisé, via ses déambulations dans les rues de Moncton et ses méditations dans les espaces du quotidien, l’auteur en arrive au constat que la polyphonie des poèmes de Leblanc est liée avant tout à la situation du poète dans l’espace communicationnel nord-américain. Moncton cesse ainsi de s’offrir comme un pur espace urbain pour devenir une réalité concrète, un chapelet de lieux et de visages familiers. Véritable réceptacle des pratiques issues de la contre-culture, l’oeuvre de Leblanc s’avère symptomatique de la condition postmoderne, qui a modifié sensiblement les paramètres régissant la position de l’écrivain dans le champ culturel. Dans cette perspective, il est possible de relire cette oeuvre comme étant l’expression de la mise en place d’une gigantesque machine cybernétique, carburant à la musique, à la voix et aux images visuelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".