MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143505658 · doi:10.1109/tim.2004.843376

The Development of a Digital Sampling System for Low Power Factor Measurements of High-Voltage Capacitive/Inductive Reactors

2005· article· en· W2143505658 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower factorHarmonicsCapacitive sensingElectrical engineeringVoltageAC powerHigh voltageComparatorEngineeringSampling (signal processing)ReactancePower (physics)Electronic engineeringPhysicsFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A digital sampling system for high-accuracy low power factor measurements of high-voltage capacitive/inductive reactors is described in this paper. The system measures these reactors with respect to a known reference providing reactance ratio and phase difference. It is suitable for automation and offers a number of advantages with respect to current-comparator-based bridges: faster operation, since no balancing is required, and operation in the presence of noise, harmonics, and power-line voltage and frequency fluctuations. Yet it retains high accuracy with an estimated relative uncertainty of less than 40/spl middot/10/sup -6/ in magnitude and 40 /spl mu/rad in phase under real high-voltage or high-current conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it