MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143507853 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226179

A scan conversion CMOS implementation for a portable ultrasonic system

2004· article· en· W2143507853 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdallah Kassem, Mohamad Sawan, Mounir Boukadoum

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceScan lineInterpolation (computer graphics)Raster graphicsImage scalingRaster scanArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer hardwareCartesian coordinate systemImage processingComputer graphics (images)PixelImage (mathematics)Grayscale

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital scan conversion is the process of converting received ultrasound signals (echoes) in multiscan lines, at varying angles (polar coordinate), to a Cartesian raster format for displaying. This conversion is necessary for compatibility with LCD and CRT monitors. To avoid artifacts during the conversion process the processed data are interpolated to produce the final memory image. The available interpolation methods typically require the use of two large memories, one for the interpolation and the other for the image display. In this paper, we use a simpler nearest-neighbor interpolation technique combined with the linear interpolation between adjacent scan lines to reduce artifacts on the far field. A hardware architecture is proposed that only uses a FIFO register and a memory for display. CMOSP18 technology is used to implement the described system. The proposed architecture is able to both reduce the complexity of the needed memory and increase the performance of the image processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207