MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143528444 · doi:10.5555/1129601.1129660

Noise margin analysis for dynamic logic circuits

2005· article· en· W2143528444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Computer Aided Design · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomino logicNoise marginElectronic circuitComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Noise (video)Electronic engineeringLogic gateWaveformLogic optimizationNoise immunityLogic synthesisControl theory (sociology)Logic familyAlgorithmEngineeringTransistorElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceVoltageTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of noise margin analysis for dynamic logic circuits. Because such circuits operate in multiple phases, their noise immunity is also time varying. We formulate noise margin analysis as a non-linear optimization problem where we find the smallest disturbance waveform that results in a qualitative change in the behavior of the circuit. We present a practical method for solving these optimization problems based on deriving a sensitivity matrix for the small-signal response of the circuit. We use our approach to compare the robustness of static CMOS gates, self-resetting domino, and output prediction logic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it