MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143576003 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2008.195

Sum Rate Maximization of MIMO Broadcast Channels with Coordination of Base Stations

2008· article· en· W2143576003 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Kaviani, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOPrecodingTelecommunications linkBase stationComputer scienceDirty paper codingSpectral efficiencyMulti-user MIMOTransmission (telecommunications)Computer network3G MIMOTransmitter power outputMaximizationTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsTransmitterChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider cooperative downlink transmission in multiuser, multi-cell and multiple-antenna cellular networks. It has been shown that multi-base coordinated transmission has significant spectral efficiency gains over that without coordination. The capacity limits can be achieved using a non-linear preceding technique known as dirty paper coding, which is still infeasible to implement in practice. This motivates investigation of a simpler linear preceding technique based on generalized zero-forcing known as block diagonalization (BD). In this paper, an enhanced form of BD is proposed for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) multi-base coordinated network. It involves optimizing the precoding over the entire null space of other users' transmissions. The performance limits of the multiple-antenna downlink with multi-base coordination are studied using duality of MIMO broadcast channels (BC) and MIMO multiple-access channels (MAC) under per-antenna power constraint, which has been established recently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207