MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143583172

Output error method for identification of multiple-model process with transition

2011· article· en· W2143583172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Advanced Control of Industrial Processes · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeightingNonlinear systemIdentification (biology)Process (computing)Exponential functionMathematical optimizationComputer scienceSystem identificationErrors-in-variables modelsControl theory (sociology)Linear modelAlgorithmNonlinear system identificationApplied mathematicsMathematicsData modelingArtificial intelligenceMachine learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with the identification of multiple model process with transition using the output error (OE) method. Local multiple linear models with output error model structure are identified at fixed operating points first and then a global nonlinear model is approximated by interpolating the multiple linear models with exponential weighting functions. With all the obtained initial values of the system's parameters, nonlinear optimization strategy is implemented to find the optimal values of the parameters for both the local multiple models and their corresponding weighting functions. Finally a more accurate global model can be obtained. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through simulation examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it