MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2143616192 · doi:10.1139/w2012-008

Detection of microcystin-producing<i>Microcystis</i>in Guanqiao Lake using a sandwich hybridization assay

2012· article· en· W2143616192 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing Zhu, Shi Du, Xian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMicrocystisMicrocystinBiologyMicrobiologyMicrocystis aeruginosaCyanobacteriaBotanyBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on sequence analyses of the mcyJ gene from Microcystis strains, a probe pair TJF and TJR was designed and a sandwich hybridization assay (SHA) was established to quantitatively detect microcystin-producing Microcystis. Through BLAST and cyanobacterial culture tests, TJF and TJR were demonstrated to be specific for microcystin-producing Microcystis. A calibration curve for the SHA was established, and the lowest detected concentration was 100 cells·mL(-1). Laboratory cultures and field samples from Guanqiao Lake were analyzed with both the SHA and microscopy. The cell number of microcystin-producing Microcystis and that of total Microcystis were compared. The biotic and abiotic components of the samples were of little disturbance to the SHA. In this study, a SHA was established to detect Microcystis, providing an alternative to PCR-ELISA and real-time PCR technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→