MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143624677 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1995.479210

Dynamic control of free-flying coordinated space robots

2002· article· en· W2143624677 on OpenAlexaff
Yan‐Ru Hu, George Vukovich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinematicsPosition (finance)Control theory (sociology)Kinematic chainObject (grammar)Robot end effectorRobotComputer scienceRobot kinematicsSpacecraftControl (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringPhysicsMobile robotClassical mechanicsAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The position and force control of coordinated robots mounted on spacecraft manipulating objects with closed kinematic chain constraints, represents an important class of control problem. In this paper, the kinematics and dynamics of such coordinated space robotic system with closed kinematic constraints are established based on these models, an approach to position and force control of free-playing coordinated space robots is proposed. The proposed control method takes into account the dynamics of the object to be manipulated and the interaction between this object and the end-effectors. The object position and internal forces due to the interaction between the object and the end-effectors are regulated simultaneously. The stability of the closed-loop free-flying coordinated robotic system is analysed using the error models of the object position and internal forces. The errors in the object position and internal forces asymptotically converge to zero under the assumption of exact kinematic and dynamic models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207