MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143627720 · doi:10.1017/s1047951101000208

Noncompaction of the myocardium associated with Roifman syndrome

2001· article· en· W2143627720 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Mandel, Eyal Grunebaum, Lee Benson

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology in the Young · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeft ventricular noncompactionVentricleCardiologyInternal medicineInterventricular septumDysplasiaDystrophyHeart failureCardiomyopathyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium, sometimes referred to as "spongy myocardium", appears as excessive and prominent trabeculations and deep intratrabecular recesses within the ventricular wall, usually involving the left ventricle, although the right ventricle and interventricular septum can also be affected. It may occur with or without additional heart malformations. Roifman syndrome is a constellation of antibody deficiency, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, facial dysmorphism, growth retardation, and retinal dystrophy. We report a patient with Roifman syndrome who presented with noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium. Our findings expand the spectrum of diseases associated with noncompaction. The recognition of noncompaction among patients with Roifman syndrome is important, as the immune deficiencies may be subtle and undiagnosed until adulthood. Thus, some patients may first present with cardiac failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology in the YoungSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207