Chemistry of zwitterionic penta-coordinate silicon compounds of the (ammoniomethyl)bis[glycolato(2)-<i>O</i><sup>1</sup>,<i>O</i><sup>2</sup>]silicate type in aqueous and nonaqueous solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The zwitterionic spirocyclic λ5Si-silicates bis[glycolato(2)-O1,O2][(trimethylammonio)methyl]silicate ([OCH2C(O)O]2SiCH2NMe3, 3) and bis[2-methyllactato(2)-O1,O2][(trimethylammonio)methyl]silicate ([OCMe2C(O)O]2SiCH2NMe3, 4) were synthesized by treatment of the zwitterionic λ5Si-silicate F4SiCH2NMe3 with 2 mol. equiv. of Me3SiOCR2C(O)OSiMe3 (R = H, Me) (formation of 4 mol. equiv. of Me3SiF). Compounds 3 (isolated as 32/3MeCN after drying in vacuo) and 4 were studied by solution 1H, 13C, and 29Si NMR spectroscopy and by solid-state VACP/MAS 13C, 15N, and 29Si NMR experiments, and the solvates 3MeCN and 42MeCN were structurally characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. These experimental investigations were complemented by computational studies of the zwitterions 3 and 4 and the anionic model species bis[2-methyllactato(2)-O1,O2]hydridosilicate(1) ([OCMe2C(O)O]2SiH, 8). Compounds 32/3MeCN and 4 and their already known derivatives [OCH2C(O)O]2SiCH2NMe2H (1) and [OCMe2C(O)O]2SiCH2NMe2H (2) were studied for their dynamic behavior (Λ/Δ-enantiomerization) in solution by VT 1H NMR spectroscopy. In addition, compounds 1, 2, 32/3MeCN, and 4 were studied in CD3OD and D2O with 1H, 13C, and 29Si NMR experiments.Key words: penta-coordinate silicon, zwitterionic λ5Si-silicates, Λ/Δ-enantiomerism, NMR spectroscopy, computational chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".