MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143684958 · doi:10.1142/s0218196706003116

TAYLOR TERMS, CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION AND THE COMPLEXITY OF POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS OVER FINITE ALGEBRAS

2006· article· en· W2143684958 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Algebra and Computation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersHungarian Scientific Research Fund
KeywordsMathematicsConstraint satisfaction problemPolynomialAlgebra over a fieldComplexity of constraint satisfactionPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsLocal consistencyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the algorithmic complexity of determining whether a system of polynomial equations over a finite algebra admits a solution. We characterize, within various families of algebras, which of them give rise to an NP-complete problem and which yield a problem solvable in polynomial time. In particular, we prove a dichotomy result which encompasses the cases of lattices, rings, modules, quasigroups and also generalizes a result of Goldmann and Russell for groups [15].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it