MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seasonal Recharge and Replenishment of Sulfate Associated with Biodegradation of a Hydrocarbon Plume

2007· article· en· W2143697060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGroundwater Monitoring & Remediation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVadose zonePlumeGroundwater rechargeSulfateAquiferGroundwaterEnvironmental chemistryWater tableInfiltration (HVAC)GeologyHydrocarbonHydrology (agriculture)ChemistryGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The downward flux of sulfate in a weathered clayey aquitard to a hydrocarbon plume in ground water was investigated at a gas well site in Alberta, Canada. The dissolved hydrocarbon plume includes monoaromatic BTEX compounds and extends less than 20 m downgradient from a natural gas condensate source in silt‐ and clay‐rich deposits. The vadose zone at the site has high concentrations of water soluble sulfate, which is apparently derived from pyrite oxidation. Seasonal infiltration of snowmelt water, most notably during the “wet” spring of 2003 and also in 2004, was focused in an excavation and recharged the water table. This recharge replenished the contaminated zone with sulfate that was flushed downward from the vadose zone. Recharge in 2003 resulted in episodic increases in sulfate concentrations in the ground water condensate plume of up to 1000 mg/L. After episodic increases in sulfate concentrations within the core of the contaminant plume associated with recharge, concentrations then decreased to less than 1 mg/L, accompanied by isotopic enrichment of the residual sulfate in 34 S. The monitoring data provide strong field evidence that bacterial sulfate reduction is a dominant terminal electron‐accepting process in the natural attenuation of the hydrocarbon plume in the ground water. This result suggests that engineered infiltration and replenishment of sulfate to petroleum hydrocarbon plumes in ground water might enhance biodegradation of these plumes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it