MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143703310 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2005.56

Dynamic Programming QoS-based Classification for Links with Limited Service Levels

2005· article· en· W2143703310 on OpenAlexaff
Amr Mohamed, Hussein Alnuweiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality of serviceComputer scienceTraffic classificationComputer networkOverhead (engineering)Quantization (signal processing)Multiprotocol Label SwitchingResidualDynamic programmingDistributed computingAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the QoS-based classification of traffic streams for a multi-class link model with predetermined service levels. Specifically, we consider a link model with fixed service levels or fixed class weights which may be represented by a finite number of MPLS label-switched-paths (LSPs). Our target is to classify a set of traffic streams each with arbitrary local QoS-demand into a small number of service levels while optimizing the residual-allocated-resources as a result of the traffic classification. The residual-allocated-resources are measured by the service-quantization-overhead which is the summation of the differences between the required QoS and the offered service level for all traffic streams. We formulate the classification as a dynamic-programming problem. We then present a group of polynomial-time-algorithms to obtain the optimal classification for soft and hard QoS requirements. We also present the concept of "differentiation factor" and show the effect of this factor on minimizing the quantization-overhead

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207