MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Basal somatodendritic dopamine release requires snare proteins

2006· article· en· W2143707367 on OpenAlexafffund
Gabriel D. Fortin, Catherine C. Desrosiers, Nobuharu Yamaguchi, Louis‐Éric Trudeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular transport and secretion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDopamineDopaminergicSynaptobrevinNeuroscienceSynaptic vesicleAxonBiophysicsChemistryBiologyCell biologyVesicleBiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dopaminergic neurons have the capacity to release dopamine not only from their axon terminals, but also from their somatodendritic compartment. The actual mechanism of somatodendritic dopamine release has remained controversial. Here we established for the first time a rat primary neuron culture model to investigate this phenomenon and use it to study the mechanism under conditions of non-stimulated spontaneous firing (1-2 Hz). We found that we can selectively measure somatodendritic dopamine release by lowering extracellular calcium to 0.5 mm, thus confirming the previously established differential calcium sensitivity of somatodendritic and terminal release. Dopamine release measured under these conditions was dependent on firing activity and independent of reverse transport through the plasma membrane. We found that treatment with botulinum neurotoxins A and B strongly reduced somatodendritic dopamine release, thus demonstrating the requirement for SNARE proteins SNAP-25 and synaptobrevin. Our work is the first to provide such direct and unambiguous evidence for the involvement of an exocytotic mechanism in basal spontaneous somatodendritic dopamine release.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurochemistrySame topicCellular transport and secretionFrench-language works237,207