MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143720144 · doi:10.1112/jlms/jdq090

Multiple positive solutions of systems of Hammerstein integral equations with applications to fractional differential equations

2011· article· en· W2143720144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the London Mathematical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsFixed-point indexEigenvalues and eigenvectorsIntegral equationMathematical analysisBoundary value problemFixed pointOperator (biology)Fixed-point theoremFourier integral operatorFractional calculusBanach space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Positive solutions of systems of Hammerstein integral equations are studied by using the theory of the fixed-point index for compact maps defined on cones in Banach spaces. Criteria for the fixed-point index of the Hammerstein integral operators being 1 or 0 are given. These criteria are generalizations of previous results on a single Hammerstein integral operator. Some of criteria are new and involve the first eigenvalues of the corresponding systems of linear Hammerstein operators. The existence and estimates of the first eigenvalues are given. Applications are given to systems of fractional differential equations with two-point boundary conditions. The Green's functions of the boundary value problems are derived and their useful properties are provided. As illustrations, the existence of nonzero positive solutions of two specific such boundary value problems is studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it