MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143727107 · doi:10.1109/icme.2006.262808

Joint Source-Channel Decoding of Multiple Description Quantized and Variable Length Coded Markov Sequences

2006· article· en· W2143727107 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohan Wang, Xiaolin Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsComputer scienceAlgorithmLossy compressionBelief propagationMarkov chainMarkov processErasureEncoderEntropy (arrow of time)Theoretical computer scienceSoft-decision decoderJoint (building)Channel (broadcasting)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a framework for joint source-channel decoding of Markov sequences that are encoded by an entropy coded multiple description quantizer (MDQ), and transmitted via a lossy network. This framework is particularly suited for lossy networks of inexpensive energy-deprived mobile source encoders. Our approach is one of maximum aposteriori probability (MAP) sequence estimation that exploits both the source memory and the correlation between different MDQ descriptions. The MAP problem is modeled and solved as one of the longest path in a weighted directed acyclic graph. For MDQ-compressed Markov sequences impaired by both bit errors and erasure errors, the proposed joint source-channel MAP decoder can achieve 5 dB higher SNR than the conventional hard-decision decoder. Furthermore, the new MDQ decoding technique unifies the treatments of different subsets of the K descriptions available at the decoder, circumventing the thorny issue of requiring up to 2K-1 MDQ side decoders

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207