MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mean Profile Depth of Pavement Surface Macrotexture Using Photometric Stereo Techniques

2007· article· en· W2143751204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZenithPhotometric stereoRoad surfaceSurface (topology)Texture (cosmology)Remote sensingGeologyGeodesyArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryMaterials scienceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pavement surface texture affects many vehicle and road characteristics; therefore, efforts are needed to develop more advanced techniques for evaluating pavement texture. Photometric stereo techniques are widely used to recover three-dimensional shapes of objects and can also be used to recover surface texture. A four-source photometric stereo system for recovering pavement surface texture is proposed. Five types of pavement surfaces were tested to validate the system. Mean profile depths computed from the recovered surface were compared with those measured manually by using a depth dial gauge. The sensitivity of the technique to illumination angle was studied for five zenith angles: σ=26 , 28, 30, 32, and 34°. The computed mean profile depths from the proposed system are linearly correlated with those from the depth dial gauge with coefficients of determination ranging from 0.82 at σ=34° to 0.92 at σ=30° . Tests showed that the proposed system can be used to recover pavement surface heights and to estimate the mean profile depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it