L'Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, un nouvel hôte pour le Cochliobolus spicifer et le Setosphaeria rostrata
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Maroc, le sol et le climat sont deux facteurs ayant encouragé le développement des cultures ornementales. Or, la situation actuelle du secteur ornemental est telle que l'entretien et le diagnostic phytosanitaire sont loin d'être pratiqués régulièrement. Des isolements fongiques à partir des lésions foliaires de l'Hibiscus rosa-sinensis ont révélé pour la première fois la présence du Setosphaeria rostrata et du Cochliobolus spicifer. Ces deux espèces induisent des symptômes foliaires différents une fois inoculées aux plantes de l'Hibiscus rosa-sinensis. Le S. rostrata provoque des lésions de forme irrégulière et de couleur brun clair ou noirâtre et entraîne un dessèchement du limbe. Le C. spicifer est responsable de lésions foliaires de couleur brun clair qui apparaissent à la marge des feuilles puis se développent vers le centre et prennent un contour pâle. Le C. spicifer est l'agent pathogène le plus agressif (coefficient d'infection = 44).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".