MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143820646 · doi:10.1517/13543784.10.5.835

Therapeutic potential of Na-H exchange inhibitors for the treatment of heart failure

2001· review· en· W2143820646 on OpenAlexaff
Morris Karmazyn

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart failureCardioprotectionAntiporterSodium–hydrogen antiporterIntracellular pHIntracellularPharmacologyIn vivoGene isoformMuscle hypertrophyMedicineInternal medicineIschemiaChemistryBiologyCell biologySodiumBiochemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Na-H exchanger (NHE) represents a family of transporters which regulate intracellular pH by removing protons in exchange for sodium influx in an electroneutral 1:1 stoichiometric relationship. Six isoforms have thus far been identified with the NHE-1 subtype representing the primary isoform in the cardiac cell. It is well-established that NHE-1 contributes to cardiac injury produced by ischaemia and reperfusion and inhibitors of the antiporter exert excellent cardioprotection. More recent evidence suggests that NHE-1 may also be important for cell growth and may contribute to the maladaptive remodelling which contributes to heart failure particularly the early hypertrophic responses. Evidence from in vitro studies suggest that NHE-1 inhibitors attenuate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in response to various stimuli whereas in vivo studies report substantial attenuation of both hypertrophy and heart failure by these agents, especially after myocardial infarction. Accordingly, NHE-1 inhibitors could emerge as important therapeutic tools for the attenuation and treatment of heart failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207