MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143821492 · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0492

Milk Synthetic Response of the Bovine Mammary Gland to an Increase in the Local Concentration of Amino Acids and Acetate

2007· article· en· W2143821492 on OpenAlexafffund
N.G. Purdie, Donald R. Trout, D. P. Poppi, J.P. Cant

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUdderAmino acidAnimal scienceChemistryLatin squareRumenMammary glandBreedInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiochemistryBiologyMastitisFermentationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rates of secretion of components into milk are a function of precursor concentrations and parameters that describe expression of the milk synthetic enzymes and their sensitivity to precursor concentrations. To establish the enzymatic sensitivities of milk fat yield and mammary acetate utilization to circulating acetate concentration, lactating cows were infused for 10 h with 0 or 40 g of acetate/h in an external iliac artery supplying one udder half. In addition, to investigate the possibility that energy supply influences the milk protein response to an elevated amino acid (AA) concentration, 2 different AA profiles were infused with and without acetate. Six cows, fed a total mixed ration of 21% crude protein ad libitum, were infused with AA at 0 g/h, 30 g/h in the profile of rumen microbes, or 30 g/h in the profile of milk proteins, in a 3 x 2 factorial arrangement with the 2 acetate treatments of 0 and 40 g/h, all in a 6 x 6 Latin square. Amino acid infusion caused a 60% increase, on average, in plasma concentration of AA entering the infused udder half. From the microbial AA profile, 49% of infused AA were taken up by the udder half, 42% of which occurred during the first pass. From the milk AA profile, 44% of infused AA were taken up by the udder half, 50% of which occurred during the first pass. There was an 8% increase in yield of milk protein with AA infusion, representing 7% capture, but no effect of the infused profile. Acetate infusion caused a decrease in the yields of milk protein and lactose when AA were infused, but not when AA were absent. Milk fat yields were not affected, although acetate concentrations in plasma entering the infused udder half increased by 123% and mammary uptakes increased by 128%. Mammary uptakes of long-chain fatty acids and beta-hydroxybutyrate were not affected by acetate infusion, whereas glucose uptakes tended to increase. It was suggested that excess acetate may have been sequestered in adipose tissue in the udder. Yields of both protein and fat in milk showed a low sensitivity to the concentration of their precursors in circulation. It was concluded that the Km in Michaelis-Menten-type equations describing milk synthesis should be assigned a low value, and that the Vmax is regulated to bring about changes in milk yield and composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207