MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143824566 · doi:10.1109/cccrv.2004.1301454

Toward glaucoma classification with moment methods

2004· article· en· W2143824566 on OpenAlex
Andrew R. McIntyre, Malcolm I. Heywood, Paul H. Artes, Syed Sibte Raza Abidi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsZernike polynomialsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFeature extractionPattern recognition (psychology)Linear discriminant analysisComputer visionGlaucomaContextual image classificationImage processingMultilayer perceptronOptic nerveClassifier (UML)Artificial neural networkImage (mathematics)OpticsWavefrontPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a series of experiments testing the feasibility of employing image-processing techniques for the feature extraction stage in the implementation of a basic optic nerve image classifier. Such a scheme completely removes the need for manually identifying the edge of the optic nerve. In this work, Zernike moments are extracted from Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography images of optic discs for the purposes of classifying the disc as healthy or damaged using a linear discriminant function derived from a linear perceptron. Our preliminary results, when compared with the performance of conventional feature sets, demonstrate the appropriateness of this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207