MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143849990 · doi:10.1017/s0263574799002155

Neuroadaptive control of elastic-joint robots using robust performance enhancement

2001· article· en· W2143849990 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRobotica · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceRobotBidirectional associative memoryContent-addressable memoryLyapunov functionLyapunov stabilityAdaptive controlJoint (building)Control engineeringStability (learning theory)Robust controlArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Control systemEngineeringNonlinear systemMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neuroadaptive control scheme for elastic-joint robots is proposed that uses a relatively small neural network. Stability is achieved through standard Lyapunov techniques. For added performance, robust modifications are made to both the control law and the weight update law to compensate for only approximate learning of the dynamics. The estimate of the modeling error used in the robust terms is taken directly from the error of the network in modeling the dynamics at the currant state. The neural network used is the CMAC-RBF Associative Memory (CRAM), which is a modification of Albus's CMAC network and can be used for robots with elastic degrees of freedom. This results in a scheme that is computationally practical and results in good performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it