Cages on Surfaces: Thiol Functionalisation of Co<sup>III</sup> Sarcophagine Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A number of new (sarcophagine)cobalt compounds containing oligopeptide substituents terminated by a mercaptoethylamide unit, [Co(R)(R′)sar]26+ (R = NH2, CH3; R′ = NHpeptideCONHCH2CH2S–), have been prepared utilising the carboxymethyl complexes [Co(R){N(CH2CO2H)}sar]3+ (R = NH2, CH3), and subsequently characterised. The amino acid residues, terminating with cystamine groups, were introduced into the carboxymethyl complexes using standard peptide coupling chemistry. The solid‐state structures of [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2H)}sar]Cl4·H2O, [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2H)2}sar]Cl3·2H2O and [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2)2}sar]Cl·6.5H2O were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction experiments, the first two forming lattices containing homochiral sheets of cations in planes parallel to [0,0,1]. In the structure of [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2H)}sar]Cl4·H2O, the cations are of the same absolute configuration, but this alternates from one sheet tothe next. In the dihydrate, [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2H)2}sar]Cl3·2H2O, the structure appears to be very similar. The sheet alternation is different from the structure of the monohydrate, [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2H)}sar]Cl4·H2O. The deprotonated imidodiacetate complex, [Co(CH3){N(CH2CO2)2}sar]Cl·6.5H2O, was prepared in an unrelated reaction; the structure displays hydogen‐bonding interactions involving the carboxylate groups and coordinated NH units. The solution electrochemistry of these compounds has been investigated using both cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. The compounds exhibited pH‐dependent, quasi‐reversible redox behaviour. A monolayer was prepared by the interaction of [Co(R)sar(GlyNHCH2CH2S–)]26+ and a gold microelectrode using both conventional “self assembly” (SAM) and electrodeposition (EDM) techniques. Surface cyclic voltammograms were measured, which, after a period of induction associated with surface reorganisation, were typical of an ordered monolayer. The monolayer was characterised by XPS, showing peaks assigned to the presence of S, Co, N, O and C. Ellipsometry gave a film thickness of 7 ± 1 Å, consistent with the formation of a mono‐ rather than a multi‐layer. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".