MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143883974 · doi:10.1002/ejic.200600626

Cages on Surfaces: Thiol Functionalisation of Co<sup>III</sup> Sarcophagine Complexes

2006· article· en· W2143883974 on OpenAlexaff
Jack M. Harrowfield, George A. Koutsantonis, Heinz‐Bernhard Kraatz, Gareth L. Nealon, Grzegorz Orłowski, Brian W. Skelton, Allan H. White

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCrystal structureDeprotonationCrystallographyCobaltStereochemistryInorganic chemistryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A number of new (sarcophagine)cobalt compounds containing oligopeptide substituents terminated by a mercaptoethylamide unit, [Co(R)(R′)sar] 2 6+ (R = NH 2 , CH 3 ; R′ = NHpeptideCONHCH 2 CH 2 S–), have been prepared utilising the carboxymethyl complexes [Co(R){N(CH 2 CO 2 H)}sar] 3+ (R = NH 2 , CH 3 ), and subsequently characterised. The amino acid residues, terminating with cystamine groups, were introduced into the carboxymethyl complexes using standard peptide coupling chemistry. The solid‐state structures of [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 H)}sar]Cl 4 · H 2 O, [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 H) 2 }sar]Cl 3 · 2H 2 O and [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 ) 2 }sar]Cl · 6.5H 2 O were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction experiments, the first two forming lattices containing homochiral sheets of cations in planes parallel to [0,0,1]. In the structure of [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 H)}sar]Cl 4 · H 2 O, the cations are of the same absolute configuration, but this alternates from one sheet tothe next. In the dihydrate, [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 H) 2 }sar]Cl 3 · 2H 2 O, the structure appears to be very similar. The sheet alternation is different from the structure of the monohydrate, [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 H)}sar]Cl 4 · H 2 O. The deprotonated imidodiacetate complex, [Co(CH 3 ){N(CH 2 CO 2 ) 2 }sar]Cl · 6.5H 2 O, was prepared in an unrelated reaction; the structure displays hydogen‐bonding interactions involving the carboxylate groups and coordinated NH units. The solution electrochemistry of these compounds has been investigated using both cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry. The compounds exhibited pH‐dependent, quasi‐reversible redox behaviour. A monolayer was prepared by the interaction of [Co(R)sar(GlyNHCH 2 CH 2 S–)] 2 6+ and a gold microelectrode using both conventional “self assembly” (SAM) and electrodeposition (EDM) techniques. Surface cyclic voltammograms were measured, which, after a period of induction associated with surface reorganisation, were typical of an ordered monolayer. The monolayer was characterised by XPS, showing peaks assigned to the presence of S, Co, N, O and C. Ellipsometry gave a film thickness of 7 ± 1 Å, consistent with the formation of a mono‐ rather than a multi‐layer. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207