MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143888114 · doi:10.2217/fmb.14.9

Elucidating the Function of the RpoS Regulon

2014· review· en· W2143888114 on OpenAlexafffund
Herb E. Schellhorn

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Microbiology · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRegulonrpoSFunction (biology)BiologyComputational biologyGeneticsBacterial proteinBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacterial adaptation to suboptimal nutrient environments, including host and/or extreme environments, is subject to complex, coordinated control involving many proteins and RNAs. Among the γ-proteobacteria, which includes many pathogens, the RpoS regulon has been a key focus for many years. Although the RpoS regulator was first identified as a growth phase-dependent regulator, our current understanding of RpoS is now more nuanced as this central regulator also has roles in exponential phase, biofilm development, bacterial virulence and bacterial persistence, as well as in stress adaptation. Induction of RpoS can also exert substantial metabolic effects by negatively regulating key systems including flagella biosynthesis, cryptic phage gene expression and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Although core RpoS-controlled metabolic functions are conserved, there are substantial differences in RpoS regulation even among closely related bacteria, indicating that regulatory plasticity may be an important aspect of RpoS regulation, which is important in evolutionary adaptation to specialized environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture MicrobiologySame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207