La poétique de l'essai au lendemain de la Révolution : l'éclairage des notes dans l' Essai sur les révolutions de Chateaubriand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’ Essai sur les révolutions de Chateaubriand est représentatif de l’abondant recours aux notes de bas de page dans ce genre et de la diversité des fonctions dont ces dernières sont investies. Il illustre particulièrement bien le procès intenté à l’érudition à un moment de crise du savoir où tous les systèmes de pensée dogmatique sont mis en difficulté. On y retrouve également la tendance à insérer dans la note des témoignages, des confidences sur la vie privée qui provoquent le glissement de l’essai vers l’autobiographie. On constate enfin que Chateaubriand y met au point des thèmes et des procédés d’écriture qui renforcent l’esthétique de la variété à l’œuvre dans l’essai et qui accentuent la fonction expérimentale du genre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".