Sensitivity of CPT I to malonyl-CoA in trained and untrained human skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study examined the sensitivity of carnitine palmitoyltransferase I (CPT I) activity to its inhibitor malonyl-CoA (M-CoA), and simulated metabolic conditions of rest and exercise, in aerobically trained and untrained humans. Maximal CPT I activity was measured in mitochondria isolated from resting human skeletal muscle. Mean CPT I activity was 492.8 +/- 72.8 and 260.8 +/- 33.6 micromol. min(-1). kg wet muscle(-1) in trained and untrained subjects, respectively (pH 7.0, 37 degrees C). The sensitivity to M-CoA was greater in trained muscle; the IC(50) for M-CoA was 0.17 +/- 0.04 and 0.49 +/- 0.17 microM in trained and untrained muscle, respectively. The presence of acetyl-CoA, free coenzyme A (CoASH), and acetylcarnitine, in concentrations simulating rest and exercise conditions did not release the M-CoA-induced inhibition of CPT I activity. However, CPT I activity was reduced at pH 6.8 vs. pH 7.0 in both trained and untrained muscle in the presence of physiological concentrations of M-CoA. The results of this study indicate that aerobic training is associated with an increase in the sensitivity of CPT I to M-CoA. Accumulations of acetyl-CoA, CoASH, and acetylcarnitine do not counteract the M-CoA-induced inhibition of CPT I activity. However, small decreases in pH produce large reductions in the activity of CPT I and may contribute to the decrease in fat metabolism that occurs during moderate and intense aerobic exercise intensities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".