MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143920670 · doi:10.1109/fpt.2008.4762365

Reconfigurable array for transcendental functions calculation

2008· article· en· W2143920670 on OpenAlexaff
Mihai Sima, Michael McGuire, Scott W. Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscendental functionComputer scienceInterconnectionPower seriesSeries (stratigraphy)MultiplexingPoint (geometry)Transcendental numberParallel computingMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Expanding transcendental functions in a series of Shift-and-Add operations is an alternative to Taylor or Chebyshev series expansions when fixed-point arithmetic with reduced wordlength is required. Typically, reconfigurable arrays do not provide architectural support for shift operations. Instead, shift operations are emulated by either multiplexing logic or multiplication by a power of 2. In this paper we describe the architecture of a reconfigurable array that can natively support shift operations. Rather than augmenting the reconfigurable fabric with dedicated shift units, the interconnection network is extended with shift capabilities. This is conceptually possible since a shift operation is a rearrangement and not a combination of the signals. Layers of computing tiles supporting Shift-and-Add/Subtract and Add-and-Select operations are interleaved with interconnect layers. On such a reconfigurable array, a variety of transcendental functions can be efficiently implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207