Les cicatrices cinéma(pho)tographiques des spectateurs cannois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’explorer les traces que laisse le Festival de Cannes dans la mémoire de ses spectateurs au travers des images photographiques que ces derniers produisent, achètent ou « volent », le temps d’une pause cannoise. Plongées dans un bain cinématographique, ces « mises à l’épreuve » de la réalité festivalière se fixent en cicatrices visuelles qu’arborent les publics, s’incarnent en démarches de spectateurs qui révèlent parfois des pas mis volontairement dans la mauvaise empreinte. L’imaginaire qui se trouve piégé dans les « photographies souvenir » du Festival de Cannes témoigne des moyens que se donne le cinéphile ordinaire de croire et de faire croire à sa participation au monde du cinéma. Cet attachement particulier au Festival de Cannes, réifiant le fétichisme déjà mis en place par le dispositif cinématographique, griffe de sa marque la carrière de spectateurs cannois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".