Coordinate Regulation of the Suf and Isc Fe-S Cluster Biogenesis Pathways by IscR Is Essential for Viability of Escherichia coli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fe-S cluster biogenesis is essential for the viability of most organisms. In Escherichia coli, this process requires either the housekeeping Isc or the stress-induced Suf pathway. The global regulator IscR coordinates cluster synthesis by repressing transcription of the isc operon by [2Fe-2S]-IscR and activating expression of the suf operon. We show that either [2Fe-2S]-IscR or apo-IscR can activate suf, making expression sensitive to mainly IscR levels and not the cluster state, unlike isc expression. We also demonstrate that in the absence of isc, IscR-dependent suf activation is essential since strains lacking both the Isc pathway and IscR were not viable unless Suf was expressed ectopically. Similarly, removal of the IscR binding site in the sufA promoter also led to a requirement for isc. Furthermore, suf expression was increased in a Δisc mutant, presumably due to increased IscR levels in this mutant. This was surprising because the iron-dependent repressor Fur, whose higher-affinity binding at the sufA promoter should occlude IscR binding, showed only partial repression. In addition, Fur derepression was not sufficient for viability in the absence of IscR and the Isc pathway, highlighting the importance of direct IscR activation. Finally, a mutant lacking Fur and the Isc pathway increased suf expression to the highest observed levels and nearly restored [2Fe-2S]-IscR activity, providing a mechanism for regulating IscR activity under stress conditions. Together, these findings have enhanced our understanding of the homeostatic mechanism by which cells use one regulator, IscR, to differentially control Fe-S cluster biogenesis pathways to ensure viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".