MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143984225 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.085421

Tuning the electromagnetic local density of states in graphene-covered systems via strong coupling with graphene plasmons

2013· article· en· W2143984225 on OpenAlexaff
Riccardo Messina, Jean‐Paul Hugonin, Jean‐Jacques Greffet, François Marquier, Yannick De Wilde, Ali Belarouci, Luc G. Fréchette, Y. Cordier, Philippe Ben‐Abdallah

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneLocal density of statesPlasmonElectromagnetic fieldDensity of statesCoupling (piping)PolaritonMaterials scienceSurface plasmonCondensed matter physicsSurface plasmon polaritonElectromagnetic radiationField (mathematics)PhysicsOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that the near-field spectrum of the local density of states of the electromagnetic field above a SiC-air interface displays an intense narrow peak due to the presence of a surface polariton. It has been recently shown that this surface wave can be strongly coupled with the sheet plasmon of graphene in graphene-SiC heterosystems. Here, we explore the interplay between these two phenomena and demonstrate that the spectrum of the electromagnetic local density of states in these systems presents two peaks whose positions depend dramatically both on the distance to the interface and on the chemical potential of graphene. This paves the way toward active control of the local density of states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicThermal Radiation and Cooling TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207