Motor unit recruitment during lengthening contractions of human wrist flexors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to revisit the question of recruitment of motor units during lengthening contractions because of conflicting views in the literature on this subject. Motor unit activity was recorded from the flexor carpi radialis muscle of four human subjects to compare the patterns of recruitment during lengthening and isometric contractions. Lengthening contractions were produced either when the subject voluntarily stopped opposing a background load or when an additional load was imposed on the already contracting muscle. In both cases, lengthening of the active muscle was produced at a variety of speeds, from quite slow to "as fast as possible." No differences in recruitment order were observed between isometric and lengthening contractions at any speed of lengthening contraction. It is concluded that all contractions in normal humans recruit motor units in an orderly fashion from small to large, according to the size principle of motor unit recruitment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it