MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144015283 · doi:10.1029/2005gl022383

Stratospheric abundances of water and methane based on ACE‐FTS measurements

2005· article· en· W2144015283 on OpenAlexaff
Ray Nassar, P. F. Bernath, C. D. Boone, G. L. Manney, Sean D. McLeod, C. P. Rinsland, R. Skelton, Kaley A. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratosphereOccultationWater vaporTrace gasAtmospheric sciencesMixing ratioMethaneEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric chemistryMiddle latitudesOzoneChemistryMeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present solar occultation measurements of H 2 O and CH 4 by the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE‐FTS). The data used here were selected from occultations spanning February to April 2004 from 0 to 79.8°N. The midlatitude volume mixing ratio (VMR) of potential water is determined as [H 2 O] + 2[CH 4 ] and from [H 2 O] versus [CH 4 ] correlations, then used to calculate the VMR of water vapor entering the stratosphere. We obtain 7.14 ± 0.23 ppm for potential water and 3.65 ± 0.29 ppm for water entering the stratosphere in 2004 for direct comparison with Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) data (1985–1994). We find a very small change in potential water and no change in water entering the stratosphere relative to the 1994 ATMOS data, indicating that increases observed by ATMOS and other instruments from that time period have not continued. This halt in stratospheric water vapor increases is consistent with recent water vapor measurements by other instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207