MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improvement in Clinical Outcomes in Treatment-Naive Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Switched From Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a to Alemtuzumab (P7.270)

2015· article· en· W2144019341 on OpenAlexaff
Hans‐Peter Hartung, Gavin Giovannoni, Douglas L. Arnold, Alasdair Coles, Edward Fox, Eva Havrdová, Krzysztof Selmaj, David Margolin, Jeffrey Palmer, Michael Panzara, D. A. S. Compston

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNeuroRx Research (Canada)Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlemtuzumabMedicineRelapsing remittingMultiple sclerosisInterferon beta-1aInterferon betaInternal medicineFamily medicineImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of switching to alemtuzumab in patients who received subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in the CARE-MS I core study. BACKGROUND: In the 2-year CARE-MS I core study (NCT00530348) of treatment-naive patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, alemtuzumab-treated patients experienced significantly reduced annualized relapse rate (ARR) compared with SC IFNB-1a-treated patients, with manageable tolerability and safety. DESIGN/METHODS: In the core study, SC IFNB-1a-treated patients received 44 μg 3 times/week. In the first 2 years of the extension study (NCT00930553), these patients received 2 annual alemtuzumab courses (12 mg intravenous). Disability was assessed quarterly with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS); relapses were assessed as needed. Efficacy outcomes were assessed by raters blinded to patients’ earlier treatment assignment. Endpoints that were evaluated included ARR, change in EDSS score, and 6-month sustained reduction in preexisting disability (SRD). RESULTS: The extension study enrolled 144 (83[percnt]) SC IFNB-1a-treated patients from CARE-MS I. Two years after switching to alemtuzumab, ARR decreased by 69[percnt] compared with the 2 years in CARE-MS I (0.39 vs 0.12). EDSS scores after 2 alemtuzumab courses were stable/improved in 73[percnt] of patients. After switching to alemtuzumab, an additional 17[percnt] of patients achieved 6-month SRD. The safety profile of alemtuzumab after switching was similar to findings from the core study. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from SC IFNB-1a to alemtuzumab improved clinical outcomes. The safety profile of alemtuzumab after switching was similar to that observed in the core study. These findings support the favorable benefit-risk profile of alemtuzumab in patients who received prior disease-modifying therapy. Study Supported by: Genzyme, a Sanofi company, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207