Fully Parallel Stochastic LDPC Decoders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stochastic decoding is a new approach to iterative decoding on graphs. This paper presents a hardware architecture for fully parallel stochastic low-density parity-check (LDPC) decoders. To obtain the characteristics of the proposed architecture, we apply this architecture to decode an irregular state-of-the-art (1056,528) LDPC code on a Xilinx Virtex-4 LX200 field-programmable gate-array (FPGA) device. The implemented decoder achieves a clock frequency of 222 MHz and a throughput of about 1.66 Gb/s at$E_{b}/N_{0}={\hbox {4.25~dB}}$(a bit error rate of$10^{-8}$). It provides decoding performance within 0.5 and 0.25 dB of the floating-point sum-product algorithm with 32 and 16 iterations, respectively, and similar error-floor behavior. The decoder uses less than 40% of the lookup tables, flip-flops, and IO ports available on the FPGA device. The results provided in this paper validate the potential of stochastic LDPC decoding as a practical and competitive fully parallel decoding approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".