Alliance entre enseignants et parents d’élèves présentant des difficultés d’attention : une analyse sémiotique des perceptions du diagnostic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La collaboration entre parents et enseignants apparaît comme un processus au sein duquel ces acteurs s’approprient des stratégies qui les aident à actualiser leurs compétences et à offrir un meilleur soutien à l’élève en difficulté. Or plusieurs études démontrent que parents et enseignants s’entendent peu et craignent respectivement d’être perçus comme incompétents. Dans le cadre d’une recherche visant les pratiques d’intervention auprès des élèves ayant des difficultés d’attention, deux groupes de réflexion ont été formés. L’analyse des données issues de ces rencontres fait émerger quelques enjeux majeurs, dont l’incertitude amenée par le diagnostic de difficultés d’attention en milieu scolaire. Elle permet aussi de questionner les conditions et stratégies d’alliances entre parents et enseignants comme partenaires dans la réussite scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".