The onset of puberty in female mice as reflected in urinary steroids and uterine/ovarian mass: interactions of exposure to males, phyto-oestrogen content of diet, and ano-genital distance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Development of puberty in female mice was examined in relationship with the ano-genital distance index (AGDI), phyto-oestrogen content of diet and exposure to males post weaning. Throughout gestation and post-natal development, females were exposed to a regular diet or a nutritionally similar diet deficient in phyto-oestrogens. After segregation at weaning on the basis of short or long AGDI, an indirect measure of in utero androgen exposure, females were housed alone or underneath two outbred adult males for 2 weeks. Female urinary samples were collected non-invasively throughout this exposure, then assayed for oestradiol, progesterone and creatinine. Females were then killed and uterine and ovarian mass was determined. Urinary oestradiol was substantially reduced in females raised on the phyto-oestrogen-free diet. Oestradiol levels were more dynamic over days in urine of male-exposed females, especially among those on the regular diet. Urinary progesterone was not strongly influenced by diet. Progesterone was more dynamic in urine of male-exposed females, and was generally elevated compared with levels in isolated females, the size of this effect dependent on AGDI, diet and whether the measure was adjusted for creatinine. Urinary creatinine was elevated by the phyto-oestrogen-free diet and reduced by male exposure, tending to decline over days in females exposed to males. Male exposure increased uterine and ovarian mass and was influenced by AGDI in interaction with diet and male exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".