MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144067748

Free Surface Density Instead of Volume Fraction in the Bone Remodeling Equation: Theoretical Considerations

2004· article· en· W2144067748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElasticity and Material Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone remodelingElasticity (physics)MechanicsVolume fractionConstitutive equationMaterials sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsFinite element methodInternal medicineMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this paper we propose a new set of constitutive equations for bone remodeling that uses the specific surface instead of volume fraction. The theory of small-strain adaptive elasticity proposed by COWIN and HEGEDUS and a surface remodeling equation are derived to develop the remodeling theory. A relationship between net bone cell activity, bone material property and mechanical stimuli is derived. For illustration, the rate of change of trabecular remodeling is derived for selected geometries. With this model, the effect of bone micro-structure and mechanical stimuli on the rate of remodeling can be studied. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElasticity and Material ModelingFrench-language works237,207