MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144096465 · doi:10.1109/icct.2000.889269

Reducing multicarrier transmission peak power with a modified simple block code

2002· article· en· W2144096465 on OpenAlexaff
Yunjun Zhang, Abbas Yongaçoğlu, Jean‐Yves Chouinard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-shift keyingOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringReduction (mathematics)Transmission (telecommunications)MultiplexingCode (set theory)Block codeCoding (social sciences)Bit error rateAlgorithmTelecommunicationsDecoding methodsEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified version of the simple block code (SBC) presented by S. Fragicomo et al. (see Electronics Letters, vol.34, no.10, p.953-4, 1998) is proposed to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of multicarrier systems (such as orthogonal frequency division multiplexing). Combined with the sub-block processing technique (see Zhang, Y. et al., IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference, vol.1, p.695-9, 1999), the proposed scheme can effectively reduce the PAPR of multicarrier systems with large frame sizes. For any given code rate, R/spl ges/3/4, the maximum PAPR reduction that could be achieved by this kind of coding scheme is also derived. A binary phase-shift-keying (BPSK) multicarrier system model is assumed to compare with some well-known results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207