MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144109928 · doi:10.1190/1.1486770

Multidimensional signature deconvolution and free-surface multiple elimination of marine multicomponent ocean-bottom seismic data

2001· article· en· W2144109928 on OpenAlexaff
Lasse Amundsen, Luc T. Ikelle, Lars E. Berg

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsSafe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionFree surfaceGeologyReflection (computer programming)Surface (topology)MultipleWaveletAlgorithmComputer scienceGeometryPhysicsMathematicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a wave-equation method for multidimensional signature deconvolution (designature) and elimination of free-surface related multiples (demultiple) in four-component (4C) ocean-bottom seismic data. The designature/demultiple method has the following characteristics: it preserves primary amplitudes while attenuating free-surface related multiples; it requires no knowledge of the sea floor-parameters and the subsurface; it requires information only of the local density and acoustic wave propagation velocity just above the sea floor; it accommodates source arrays; and no information (except location) of the physical source array, its volume, and its radiation characteristics (wavelet) is required. Designature is an implicit part of the demultiple process; hence, the method is capable of transforming recorded reflection data excited by any source array below the sea surface into free-surface demultipled data that would be recorded from a point source with any desired signature. In addition, the incident wavefield is not subtracted from the data prior to free-surface demultiple; hence, separation of incident and scattered fields is not an issue as it is for most other free-surface demultiple schemes. The designature/demultiple algorithm can be divided into two major computational steps. First, a multidimensional deconvolution operator, inversely proportional to the time derivative of the downgoing part of the normal component of the particle velocity just above the sea floor, is computed. Second, an integral equation is solved to find any component of the designatured, free-surface demultipled multicomponent field. When the geology is horizontally layered, the designature and free-surface demultiple scheme greatly simplifies and lends itself toward implementation in the τ–p domain or frequency–wavenumber domain as deterministic deconvolution of common shot gathers (or common receiver gathers when source array variations are negligible).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207