MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144154975 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.006

Management guidelines for obstetric patients and neonates born to mothers with suspected or probable severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)

2009· article· en· W2144154975 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cynthia Maxwell, Allison McGeer, Kin Fan Young Tai, Mathew Sermer, Dan Farine, Melanie Basso, Marie‐France Delisle, Lynda Hudon, Savas Menticoglou, William Mundle, Annie Ouellet, Mark H. Yudin, Marc Boucher, Eliana Castillo, Béatrice Cormier, Andrée Gruslin, Deborah Money, Kellie E. Murphy, Caroline Paquet, Audrey Steenbeek, Nancy Van Eyk, Julie van Schalkwyk, Thomas Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsInnovation and Economic Development Trois RivièresCongress of Aboriginal PeoplesCegep de Trois-RivieresOntario Neurotrauma FoundationManitoba Beekeepers' AssociationThe Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyMEDLINETask forceExpert opinionIntensive care medicinePediatricsFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This document summarizes the limited experience of SARS in pregnancy and suggests guidelines for management. OUTCOMES: Cases reported from Asia suggest that maternal and fetal outcomes are worsened by SARS during pregnancy. EVIDENCE: Medline was searched for relevant articles published in English from 2000 to 2007. Case reports were reviewed and expert opinion sought. VALUES: Recommendations were made according to the guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207