Transient expression of a reporter gene changes significantly during somatic embryogenesis in alfalfa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transient expression of the β -glucuronidase (GUS) gene driven by a 35S constitutive promoter was investigated during somatic embryo development in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) following micro-projectile bombardment. The level of gene expression varied with the different developmental stages and changed dramatically within the stages. During embryogenic callus induction (stage I), expression was low in explants freshly transferred to culture, but increased when cells started to divide and show competence for somatic embryogenesis. Gene expression, however, decreased when extensive callus formation began and reached the lowest observed level when callus was fully developed. Reporter gene expression was consistently low during embryogenic cell proliferation (stage II). In contrast, high levels of reporter gene expression were detected in non-embryogenic suspension cultures during cell proliferation. Extremely low reporter gene expression was detected in embryonal tissues and young embryos at the embryo development and maturation stage (stage III). Expression increased as the somatic embryos developed and reached the highest level when the embryos reached maturity. Transient expression levels were similar in excised petiole tissue across 10 alfalfa genotypes, which included both diploid and tetraploid genotypes. In general, reporter gene expression was found to be higher in more organised mature tissues and organs than in less-organised or young tissues. The developmental status of the cells and tissues appears to be an important factor in the degree of transient expression of the introduced gene. Changes of gene expression during embryogenesis and factors affecting gene expression are discussed. Key words: GUS expression, Medicago sativa, bombardment, forage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".